• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文OA文献 >Adaptive Water Governance: Assessing the Institutional Prescriptions of Adaptive (Co-)Management from a Governance Perspective and Defining a Research Agenda
【2h】

Adaptive Water Governance: Assessing the Institutional Prescriptions of Adaptive (Co-)Management from a Governance Perspective and Defining a Research Agenda

机译：适应性水治理：从治理角度评估适应性（共同）管理的制度规定并定义研究议程

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This article assesses the institutional prescriptions of adaptive (co-)management based on a literature review of the (water) governance literature. The adaptive (co-)management literature contains four institutional prescriptions: collaboration in a polycentric governance system, public participation, an experimental approach to resource management, and management at the bioregional scale. These prescriptions largely resonate with the theoretical and empirical insights embedded in the (water) governance literature. However, this literature also predicts various problems. In particular, attention is called to the complexities associated with participation and collaboration, the difficulty of experimenting in a real-world setting, and the politicized nature of discussion on governance at the bioregional scale. We conclude this article by outlining a common research agenda that invites the collaborative efforts of adaptive (co-)management and governance scholars.
机译：本文基于对（水）治理文献的文献综述，评估了适应性（共同）管理的制度性规定。适应性（共同）管理文献包含四个机构规定：多中心治理系统中的协作，公众参与，资源管理的实验方法以及生物区域规模的管理。这些规定很大程度上与（水）治理文献中嵌入的理论和经验见解产生了共鸣。但是，该文献也预言了各种问题。尤其要注意与参与和协作相关的复杂性，在实际环境中进行试验的难度以及在生物区域规模上进行治理的讨论的政治化性质。在本文的结尾，我们概述了一个共同的研究议程，该议程邀请了适应性（联合）管理和治理学者的共同努力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号